Suggestions(1)
Similar(60)
Finite state machines based testing has been successfully applied to RBAC systems and enabled to obtain effective test cases, but very expensive.
Urine based testing has been successful for the detection of common sexually transmitted infections, including Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoea.
PCR based testing has been called into question, as false positives can be because of cross-reactivity with related viruses, or to laboratory contamination.
Now it is clear that recessive inheritance is also possible and mutations may have been missed in similar cases, because heteroduplex based testing has been used until recently in many large diagnostic centers.
Its development as a real time PCR based test has been reported [ 45].
Decreased sensitivity in oral tests compared to blood based tests has been reported [ 14] but there are limited available data on the performance of whole blood tests in the context of self-testing.
Although polymerase chain reaction-based tests have been developed, they are not widely used in areas where malaria is common as of 2012, due to their complexity.
In particular, structural-based and mutation-based testing have been on focus by several research initiatives [8, 9, 11 29].
Although different approaches to HIV testing, including voluntary counseling and testing, provider-initiated counseling and testing, mobile testing and home-based testing, have been shown to increase the prevalence of HIV testing [ 1– 3], HIV self-testing may be able to reach individuals who have never tested as well as offer a convenient alternative for repeat testing.
Recently, fault-based criteria, such as that ones based on mutation testing, have been investigated for variability test using the FM (Ferreira et al. 2013; Henard et al. 2013a).
In the absence of overt clinical signs of Johne's Disease (JD), laboratory based tests have largely been limited to organism detection via faecal culture or PCR and serological tests for antibody reactivity.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com