Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(2)
Exact(60)
The first selection, based on title and abstract, was done by one reviewer (WGD).
Studies were selected based on title, abstract, and paper information (as number of pages, for example).
During the first stage of study selection, 319 publications were excluded based on title and abstract.
Identified studies were reviewed for eligibility by two authors (MS, MvdW) based on title and abstract.
We excluded 62 studies based on title and abstract review.
166 references remained after selection based on title and abstract.
Based on title, nineteen studies were identified as potentially relevant.
Nonrelevant studies were excluded based on title and abstract.
Out of these 5,390 papers, 1,113 met the inclusion criteria at first screening based on title, and 66 based on title and abstract.
Of the 555 remaining articles, 416 were excluded based on title and abstract.
Two reviewers selected the identified documents based on title and abstract (where available).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com