Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Genotyping concordance rate was 99.996% based on study duplicates.
Similar(59)
Following removal of duplicate reports, a first decision on inclusion/exclusion was made based on study titles and abstracts.
An analysis of the c-myc genes in common carp estimated that the tetraploidization event occurred 58 MYA [ 5] while another study, based on other duplicated genes in common carp, reported a tetraploidization time of less than 16 MYA [ 6].
Eight mesocosms were studied based on a duplicated 22 factorial design tracking bacterial community and hydrological changes during an 8 month start-up period.
Identification of duplicates was based on the study identifier appearing twice in an identical form, and it is possible that some duplicates were missed through being labelled slightly differently (for example as "Smith 2001a" and "Smith 2001b").
The concordant rate calculated based on 100 duplicates for each SNP was 99.6%.
> -wrap-foot> Reported values based on biological duplicates.
The interassay CV for glucose based on blind duplicates was <3%.
The concordant rates of all SNPs based on 120 duplicates were 100%.
The concordance rates based on 100 duplicates were over 99% for all these SNPs.
Intra-assay CV for Hp was calculated in the same manner, based on seven duplicates.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com