Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
A study protocol for a systematic qualitative literature review was developed based on recommended methods [29].
We undertook the review of safety of interventions based on recommended methods, including those of Cochrane adverse effects subgroup.
Similar(57)
Cost-effectiveness thresholds were based on WHO recommended methods, i.e., each intervention was classified as (a) highly cost-effective if it averted a year of life lost or if it averted a DALY for less than the national gross domestic product (GDP) per capita (in I$), (b) cost effective if 1 3 times GDP per capita, and (c) not cost-effective if greater than 3 times the GDP per capita.
Laboratory confirmation (Table 1) was based on 3 WHO recommended methods, IS2404 quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), microscopy, and histopathology.
Transfection was carried out with a Nucleofector (Lonza, Cologne, Germany) based on the manufacturer's recommended methods.
The sample size for the pilot was based on methods recommended by Thabane et al., 2010 [ 21] using a confidence interval approach to estimate sample sizes for pilot studies.
The systematic review was conducted based on a protocol designed with widely recommended methods 21 22 that complied with reporting guidelines for meta-analyses.
The systematic review was based on a protocol designed with widely recommended methods to allow us to comply with reporting guidelines.
The systematic review was conducted based on a protocol designed with widely recommended methods 15 16 that complied with guidelines for reporting meta-analysis 17 (www.bctu.bham.ac.uk/systematicreview/hmb/protocol.shtml).shtml
Illustrative design examples are presented based on the recommended design methods.
A number of different methods of assessing option and distractor performance were adopted in this study based on the methods recommended in Haladyna and Downing ([1993]).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com