Here, we present the analysis of a large set of proteomic data aiming to examine at the proteome level the response of C. acetobutylicum to butanol and butyrate stress and a comparative analysis of these proteomic data against two sets of transcriptomic data, one based on microarray analysis [ 16] and the second on RNAseq [ 15].
These findings indicate that a carrier design based on microarray analysis and the manipulation of intracellular trafficking constitutes a rational strategy for reducing the host immune response to NPs.
Based on microarray analysis, we identified many differentially expressed genes that involved in carbohydrate and lipid metabolism.
The ins-13 probe is not specific, and it appears to report expression of acdh-2 based on microarray analysis [17].
HTR1B and HTR7A, which were not differential based on microarray analysis might also be present in HVC, but this will required further confirmation.
The determination of microarray study specific gene classifiers has lead to the proposed identification of various CFS reporter genes, based on microarray analysis of gene expression [3] [10].
Only two of the genes that are absent from the other sequenced isolates, only two of the genes are shared among all of the bovine mastitis-associated SA isolates based on microarray analysis.
The fundamental idea of recent studies on drug resistance has been to categorize cell lines into sensitive, resistant and intermediate groups based on drug dose response experiments and subsequently to generate a genetic classifier or signature based on microarray analysis.
According to Oncomine [18] preliminary data based on microarray analysis, the CHL1 expression also varies in several major cancer types – renal [21], [22], cervical [23], colon [24], [25], ovary [26], lung [27], [28], stomach [29] and breast [30], [31] cancer.
Thirty-eight comparisons were expected to exhibit no significant difference in expression based on microarray analysis, and of these 24 (63%) were confirmed as having no difference in expression, 14 (37%) demonstrated a significant difference when the array predicted no difference (false negative) (FDR, 0.05).
Based on microarray analysis, differentially expressed genes were identified.
