Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(7)
The power calculation was based on expected differences in SF-36 z-scores.
Sample size calculations were based on expected differences in the occurrence of disease related end points, as described previously.
Initially, the power calculation was based on expected differences in the percentage of patients with 1% improvement in HbA1c levels in both treatment groups.
Sample size was calculated based on expected differences in scale scores between women who had received a screening mammogram in the prior 15 months and those who had not.
Endpoints, measuring instruments, and time of data collection are shown in table 1. *those patients with a positive MCI screening at baseline The power calculation is based on expected differences in SF-36 z-scores.
As the primary outcome variable was changed into a continuous variable due to an amendment to the protocol in November 2008, the power calculation was changed as follows: The power calculation was based on expected differences in HbA1c levels of the comparison groups in the (ITT) sample.
Similar(53)
Quality of results was evaluated based on expected Ct differences among three cDNA amounts as well as product melting curves.
The sample size for the present study was therefore based on feasibility rather than on expected differences in outcome.
We have based the sample size estimates on expected differences between the intervention group and the control group in communication between the genetic counselors and counselees about psychosocial issues.
These data enabled us to calculate the difference between responses based on expected satiation and responses based on perceived volume at different levels of meal variety.
Only locus TA161 deviated from HWE due to null alleles as detected using a null allele test based on expected homozygote and heterozygote allele size difference frequencies [ 36].
More suggestions(14)
based on expected costs
based on expected levels
based on expected payoffs
based on expected effects
based on expected norms
based on expected queries
based on expected outcomes
based on expected heterozygosities
based on expected values
based on expected benefits
based on expected changes
based on expected sales
based on expected increases
based on expected rates
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com