Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
The diagnosis of osteoporosis is often based on bone density.
In China, as many as 88.26 million individuals are currently estimated to have osteoporosis based on bone density measurement.
The bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DEXA in all bones, and the radial bones were assigned to 6 equiv alent groups based on bone density and total amount of mineral.
Similar(56)
The purpose of this study was to evaluate changes in bone quantity based on bone mineral density (BMD) and bone quality based on trabecular bone score (TBS) in Graves' disease patients after anti-thyroid therapy.
As the current diagnostic technique based on bone mineral density (BMD) provides no information on bone quality, the Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) has been proposed to reflect bone microarchitecture status.
The current evaluation approach based on bone mineral density (BMD) measurements lacks sensitivity, and it has become clear that as well as bone mass, bone quality should also be evaluated.
Current guidelines recommend antiresorptive therapy based on bone mineral density (BMD), and emerging guidelines include both clinical risk factors and BMD to assess the overall fracture risk.
Micro-CT model generation allows for these effects to be minimized, and for the generation of material assignment based on bone volume and mineral density (Dall'Ara et al. 2011; Zysset et al. 2015).
Because epidemiologic research has shown that low bone density is an important risk factor for fracture [ 2], osteoporosis screening in Japan is based on bone densitometry.
The patients are referred for a DEXA scan and, based on the bone density measurement, we diagnose the patient as having normal bone mass, osteopenia, or osteoporosis.
Despite the medical community's heavy reliance on bone density scans, there is growing evidence that bone density is not the most reliable indicator of bone health.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com