Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
GLDLA0BLUP yielded on average a 0.06 higher accuracy than SSGBLUP and a 0.07 higher accuracy than GBLUP based on a sire model.
We compared the above methods based on an animal model to methods based on a sire model (SM), for which only the genotyped bulls in the TRAIN dataset (Table 2) and their DYD were used as (unweighted) data records.
The introduction of genotyped cows in dairy cattle breeding will make GS based on a sire model less suitable, because genotyped cows can only be included as 'bulls with very inaccurate DYD' (i.e. phenotypes) in SM-GBLUP.
In GS based on a sire model, the weighing of these alternative information sources (real DYD and phenotypes) will be delicate, with a risk of double counting records (methods should be used that avoid double counting).
Similar(56)
Monthly survival (0/1) was analysed using a repeated measures model that included random DGE and IGE regressions on time (hence RMM.t) based on a sire-dam model.
The terminal line is typically selected based on a terminal sire index that can consist of growth, meat quality, and carcass traits.
Most estimations of genetic variance in survival models have been based on sire or sire-maternal grand sire models [ 4, 16, 22, 23].
We also applied SM-ABLUP, which is the same as SM-GBLUP except that the genomic relationship matrix is replaced by the pedigree-based relationship matrix A. Table 3 shows the correlations between 2013 DYD and 2007 EBV within the VAL set of bulls for the methods based on a two-step sire model (standard errors are from 10,000 bootstrapping samples [ 20]).
We did find higher values for correlations involving general mastitis but compared to [ 24], who reported values close to unity (0.87 to 0.94) based on a linear pedigree-based sire model, the values found in the present study were much lower.
Never use EPDs to select a sire based on a single trait.
Simulations were based on a general pedigree design originating from 2 unrelated sires.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com