Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(3)
Two different knee-joint kinetic models (pin-joint approximation and anatomically based model) are compared against a condition with no exoskeleton.
The results of these two models (i.e., robust model and mean-value based model) are compared with each other at the following.
In this work, prediction errors on test sets obtained by using an ODE based model are compared to the residuals from an unsupervised data analysis method which does not make any use of biochemical knowledge.
Similar(57)
Performance of the developed ADM based model is compared with the reactor scale models in which the reactor back-mixing is represented using some combination of the two limiting ideal reactor models of, complete stirred or plug flow.
The background characteristics of the respondents who received VCT through either the facility or home based models are compared in Table 1 below.
In this work, rough set based models are compared with other data-driven methods with respect to two factors related to clinical credibility: accuracy and accessibility.
Predictions from the developed correlation based models were compared with the condenser's (ACC and WCC) performance of three different screw chiller manufacturers and they match within ±8% and ±11% for ACC and WCC at 70 – 100% load.
An NACA0015 airfoil is used for the baseline model; the aerodynamic characteristics of the base model are compared with that of the optimal solutions.
The surrogate-based model and the Power-Flow-based model are compared, and the results show similar accuracy but enhanced efficiency of the former.
Results provided by the FEM-based model are compared with experiments for three geometries, thus validating the accuracy of the proposed approach.
Additionally, the output power from the base model was compared with the power outputs of another modified design by keeping the rotor diameter and blade length constant (300 mm and 160 mm) but varying the blade diameters (20 mm, 40 mm and 80 mm) respectively.
More suggestions(2)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com