Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Moreover, in the vast majority of cases the evaluation of the sampled and examined individuals is still based just on morphological similarities and discontinuities (alpha-taxonomy) and remains to be confirmed by phylogenetic reconstructions.
Similar(59)
Therefore, our hypothesis is based only on morphological evaluation.
The most obvious differences between the morphological and molecular anopluran phylogenies involve the family Polyplacidae, which is monophyletic based on morphological data but paraphyletic based on molecular data.
Identification based on morphological traits was based on Vaughan (Vaughan 1989; Vaughan 2003) and discussed in Villafañe et al. (2007).
Comparing phylogenies derived from morphological and molecular datasets is a powerful way to detect phylogenetic incongruence, or likewise, to strengthen an existing phylogenetic hypothesis based on just one of the two data types [ 44].
They have in the past been classified mainly based on morphological, but also on functional criteria.
Most importantly, relationships based on LFY2int2-N were congruent to previous studies based on morphological and molecular marker data.
We have explored two versions of morphological multi-scale metric, Morphological Pyramid Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio measure, MP-PSNR, based on morphological pyramid decomposition and Morphological Wavelet Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio measure, MW-PSNR, based on morphological wavelet decomposition.
Two versions of morphological multiscale metric have been explored: (a) Morphological Pyramid Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio metric (MP-PSNR) based on morphological pyramid decomposition, and (b) Morphological Wavelet Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio metric (MW-PSNR) based on morphological wavelet decomposition.
The first hypothesis relies heavily on DNA analysis, whereas the others are based on morphological studies of fossils.
species based on morphological data.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com