Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Similar(60)
While studies have shown that values found in anchor-based and distribution-based approaches are often comparable, in calculations based on distribution-based approaches it is still not taken into account which amount of change is considered relevant by patients.
Regression-based approaches are often employed to estimate riverine constituent concentrations and fluxes based on typically sparse concentration observations.
Pharmacophore-based approaches are often used in drug design because of the missing 3D structure of many interesting macromolecules.
When the 3D structure of the binding site is unknown, pure ligand-based approaches are often used to perceive the 3D pharmacophore.
However, spectral patterns learnt by NMF-based approaches are often hard to interpret and lack explicit semantics.
However, due to exhaustive computations including non-linear multi-dimensional optimization processes in the SfM algorithm, model-based approaches are often considered impractical solutions for user localization.
Anchor-based approaches are often easier to interpret for clinical audiences than the distributional-based approaches.
Preference-based approaches are often used in cost-effectiveness analyses and incorporate values or utilities for health outcomes [ 23].
Thus, population-based approaches are often the best option and can identify covariates that may be useful to guide dose individualization.
Model-based approaches are often used to investigate the formation of morphogen gradients and to analyze the sufficiency of the known regulatory mechanisms.
The 'tree-based' approaches are often considered superior to the 'pair-linking' methods because the former utilize explicit algorithms to identify duplication and speciation events on the gene/protein family tree, whereas pair-linking methods use the symmetric-best-match relationship as a surrogate criterion of orthology.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com