Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
When LVEF is low a pressure evaluation based approach seems more accurate.
Similar(59)
For jobs, the skill-based approach seems more adequate, as are the terms 'overskilling' and 'underskilling'underskilling
In our hands, the FACS-based approach seems more reliable for this purpose, as its single-cell measurement may allow for more accurate determination of the residual cell-bound PS (resp., the amount of PS released from cells) than if it is summarily measured in lysed cells.
This is an interesting fact observed during the experiments: the MC based approach seems to be more sensitive than the GA based approach with respect to the strengths of the SRLS.
From this point of view, specimens' based approaches seem promising.
MLPA approach seems more reliable as it is based on hybridization of probes to genomic regions of interest.
But the approach seems more timely now.
In these situations, a PF approach seems more appropriate.
Although this approach seems more user-friendly, it has significant drawbacks in terms of security.
In comparison, the result from the "binary soft-prior" approach seems more sensitive to segmentation error.
Some approaches seem more useful to prioritise health interventions than others.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com