Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The base case utility for patients treated medically or with PCI or CABG was estimated from the EQ-5D utility scores taken from the APPROACH cohort.
Similar(59)
A third study used a base case utility value of 0.999 for taking a statin daily for 10 years and found a cost/QALY gain of US$349955 for a 55-year-old man. 3 Assuming no disutility from taking a pill and altering that utility value to only 1.0, the cost/QALY decreases nearly 25% to US$263944.
2 Although the authors used a base case utility value of 0.99 for warfarin, they performed a one-way sensitivity analysis varying that utility value from 0.95 to 1.0.
Among patients age ⩾60 years, in the base case when utility weights for the TOX and REL health states were both set equal to 0.5, nab-PC patients (vs sb-PC) experienced a significant mean Q-TWiST gain of 1.4 months (11.1 vs 9.8 months; 95% CI of difference: 0.2 2.6).
For base case analyses, utility values will be defined using the EQ-5D where possible, in line with NICE's preferred method.
The base case estimate for the utility associated with this state assumes life-long sequelae [ 13].
Where necessary costs were inflated to 2005 values For the base case analysis, health state utilities for the events reported in PROactive were derived wherever possible from the CODE-2 study [ 31].
For example, one study examined whether cost-effectiveness of aspirin was sensitive to the assigned utility value of taking the pill. 1 The base case used a utility value of 1.0; the authors then examined the cost per QALY gained across a variety of utility values for taking aspirin.
Utility decrements for toxicities were generated by subtracting the utility for the base case (no change) from the utility of the toxicity state (each of which was described in association with no change).
Three cases (base case, only optimized utility supply networks, and IUBSNs) are conducted, and an increase in hydrogen demand is applied to each case.
Prove a base case for the problem.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com