Sentence examples for basal readings from inspiring English sources

After basal readings the mice were removed from the metabolic chambers for a short time (6 min) and injected subcutaneously with NE (1 mg/kg) before return to the metabolic chambers for 60 min.

Cells were pooled into Ca2+-responsive cells and Ca2+-unresponsive cells determined by a change of the 340/380 nm signal of ≥0.05 and <0.05 (relative to basal readings) in response to 30 mM KCl respectively.

After adjustment for background fluorescence normalization was achieved by dividing each ratio value at time point × (Rx) by the mean fluorescence ratio value taken from hundreds of basal fluorescence ratio readings (Rbasal).

The cell density per well was used to normalize chemiluminescence readings and the basal phosphorylation status in each cell line was calculated by dividing the active phospho-protein-specific antibody with that of total-protein-specific antibody.

In this RABBIT surgery trial, a glucose <70 mg/dL was reported in 23.1% of patients (1.9% of glucose readings) in the basal-bolus and in 4.7% (0.3% of readings) in the SSI group (P = <0.001), but there were no significant differences in the frequency of severe hypoglycemia.

The RABBIT surgery trial also reported a higher percentage of glucose readings <140 mg/dL with basal bolus compared with SSI treatment (53 ± 30 vs. 31 ± 28%) (14).

Few previous RCTs targeted to answer the question if SMBG is lowering A1C in this situation, although adjustment of basal bedtime insulin dosage is based on SMBG readings (27, 28).

The percentages of glucose readings <140 mg/dL were higher in basal-bolus than in SSI treatment group (53 ± 30 vs. 31 ± 28%; P < 0.001).

Overnight basal insulin rates were evaluated with the blood glucose readings at 2200, 0300, and 0700 h and set using the same method (4).

Similarly, there were fewer BG readings >200 mg/dL in the sitagliptin and glargine group compared with basal bolus and sitagliptin alone (13, 21, and 21%, respectively); however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.23).

The most accurate readings are taken in the vagina or rectum, but there are also basal temperature thermometers designed to take readings in the mouth.