Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Buckling of the tie-bar was considered as the case when one of the natural frequencies is zero.
In the case when (bar {z}_{0}=|bar{z}_{1}|neq0), we proceed in the proof in two main steps.
The resulting higher limits of agreement signal less agreement than is actually the case when inspecting the bar charts of differences between physicians and patients.
The maximum principle in (Yong 2010) is (f_{z}(bar {z}(t))(u-bar {u}(t))geq 0), ∀u∈U, a.e., a.s., which only covers the case when U is convex.
Such was the case when a rowdy crowd poured into the bar's heavily wooded interior to watch the first Yankees' postseason game.
And that certainly was the case when John Galliano decided to praise Hitler and his gas chambers when tussling with a patron in a Parisian bar.
In the case when (bar{z}_{0}=|bar{z}_{1}|=0), (mathcal{CNC}) condition means that (A(bar{x})Re^{m}=Re^{p}), which is equivalent to 0=A(bar{x})^{T}etaquad Rightarrowquad eta=0 and hence condition (15) holds.
(J u)) is even, bounded from below, (J 0) = 0) and (J u)) satisfies the local Palais-Smale condition, i.e. for some (bar{c} > 0), in the case when every sequence ({u_{k}}) in E satisfying (lim_{krightarrowinfty}J u_{k}) = c < bar{c}) and (lim_{krightarrowinfty}|J' u_{k})|_{E^{ast}} = 0) has a convergent subsequence.
(C1): (J u)) is even, bounded from below, (J 0) = 0) and (J u)) satisfies the local Palais-Smale condition, i.e. for some (bar{c} > 0), in the case when every sequence ({u_{k}}) in E satisfying (lim_{krightarrowinfty}J u_{k}) = c < bar{c}) and (lim_{krightarrowinfty}|J' u_{k})|_{E^{ast}} = 0) has a convergent subsequence.
It is observed that the inequality (18) reduces to Ebigl{ | delta tilde{u}_{k + 1}|_{1}bigr} le bigl| Ebigl{ | I - Gamma Lambda_{k}HOmega_{k} |bigr} bigr| _{1}Ebigl{ | delta tilde{u}_{k} |_{1}bigr} for the case when (bar{alpha} = 0) and (bar{omega} = 0), respectively.
A similar argument applies to the case when (D_{jt} ge bar{D}_{j}).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com