Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
This could be possible as the barrier question was asked to all those with avoidable visual impairment and not specific to a cause.
Similar(59)
Lastly, assumptions were made when analyzing the two cost barrier questions.
Their results showed that the extent and severity of OHIP-14 scores increased alongside the number of positive responses to cost barrier questions.
All barrier questions, except for media and the use of other research sources, had the following 5-point Likert-type response scale: totally agree, agree, neither agree nor disagree, disagree, totally disagree.
There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics of participants who did not want to be transplanted and did not respond to any of the questions asked (those with missing data for all perceived barrier questions) and those who responded to at least one of the questions except by income status (P = 0.0435.
Two hundred and ten (28%) individuals gave ambiguous replies to the barriers question, to the expectations not met question or to both.
The barriers question was asked to all those who had visual impairment due to any cause and/or those who had presbyopia.
The present study has several limitations, including under-representation of younger adults and reliance on self-reported MH data; the target group for the barriers questions could have also been expanded to include those who reported their needs were met.
Nevertheless, amongst those to whom the barriers questions were addressed (N = 218), mean endorsement ratings were generally low (<2.4 on the 1 5 scale), although half (53.7%) identified some structural barriers and most (93.1%) identified some attitudinal barriers (i.e., at least one item rated above 'not at all').
Thus this problem can be regarded as a double barrier option question (see [1, 2]).
Since the extended authorisation requirement is trade-restrictive (non-tariff barrier) the question is whether the regulation is also more trade-restrictive than necessary (necessity test).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com