Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(5)
Minimum ruminal pH tended to be lower in cows fed barley compared with those fed corn (5.47 vs. 5.61).
Dry matter intake and N intake were higher in cows fed dry-rolled barley compared with those fed pelleted barley.
Milk fat content and milk fat yield were higher in cows fed dry-rolled barley compared with those fed pelleted barley.
Apparent total-tract digestibility of N tended to be greater in cows fed barley compared with those fed corn, whereas apparent total-tract digestibility of acid-digestible fiber was greater in cows fed corn compared with those fed barley.
Urea-N production was higher (442.2 vs. 334.3 g of N/d), and urea-N entering the GIT tended to be higher (272.9 vs. 202.0 g of N/d), in cows fed dry-rolled barley compared with those fed pelleted barley.
Similar(55)
The use of T. urartu and Ae. tauschii genome information greatly increased the number of markers aligned on the same homoeologous group chromosomes of barley compared with the B-genome markers (Table 3).
Feeding steam-flaked broom sorghum alone or with ground barley compared with ground sorghum or the blend of ground barley and ground broom sorghum decreased plasma urea nitrogen increased glucose in plasma.
In a comparison between vetch and barley under Mediterranean environments and alkaline soil, N2O emissions were higher for barley than vetch; furthermore, the N2O fluxes derived from the synthetic fertilizers added to the crops were 2.5 times higher in barley compared with vetch [29].
Plant weight was significantly lower for wild barley compared with cultivars and landraces across all treatments (Table 2; P = 0.0032).
There was no significant association with IA in children with a GI illness occurring before introduction to wheat or barley compared with children with no GI illness before wheat or barley introduction.
Root length density and SRL were also significantly lower in wild barley compared with landraces and cultivars (Table 2; P < 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com