We will approximate them with their bare value A p 1, p 2 = Z ˆ 1 where necessary.
Following Policy 0 (conventional harvest), the higher bare land values were obtained from fertile sites with a greater temperature sum (Tables 1 and 2).
The maximized bare land values were higher systematically for lower initial densities from all combinations of site type and temperature region (Table 2).
resulted in the highest bare land value (3714 €∙ha−1).
led to the lowest bare land value (302 €∙ha−1).
A bare minimum value of UTS would be $900 million, Roach figures.
The financial returns (bare land value) were computed with a 3%% interest rate.
The optimal solutions maximizing bare land value indicate that conventional forest management regimes remain optimal for sparse stands.
Bare land value and the effect of tree removal on the growth of remaining trees both increase the rate of value increment at which cutting is optimal decision.
where f : E n × E 3 → E 1 is the objective function for the bare land value (BLV) of a thinning regime, E n denotes n-dimensional real Euclidean space, n is the number of thinnings, n + 1 means final felling.
