Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(6)
Recording electrodes were constructed from Teflon-coated stainless steel wire (bare diameter 125 µm: A-M Systems Inc). A-M Systems Inc
Stimulating electrodes were prepared by twisting together two stainless steel wires (A-M Systems, Sequim, WA, USA) with bare diameter of 0.005 Coated-0.008 Coated-0.008
Recording electrodes were prepared from Tungsten wire (A-M Systems) with bare diameter of 0.008 Coated-0.011 Coated-0.011 to soldereds stoel wire.
LFP, reference and auxiliary electrodes were made from 50-mm-long 5T Teflon®-coated silver wire (125 μm bare diameter, 177 μm coated diameter), with one end soldered into a gold-plated contact (E363/0, Plastics One).
CPEs were constructed from 8T Teflon®-insulated silver wire (200 μm bare diameter, 270 μm coated diameter; Advent Research Materials, Suffolk, UK) soldered into gold-plated socket contacts (E363/0, Plastics One, Roanoke, VA, USA).
Carbon paste electrodes (CPEs) were constructed from 50-mm-long 8T (200 μm bare diameter, 270 μm coated diameter) Teflon®-coated silver wire (Advent Research Materials, Suffolk, UK) soldered into gold-plated socket contacts (E363/0, Plastics One, Roanoke, VA, USA).
Similar(54)
Bare package diameter 69 mm, Full package diameter 200 mm, Winding speed 500 m/min, Yarn used 20 s Ne cotton yarn, Coil angle range 10° 18°, Overfeed 15%%.
Suitable traverse ratios were found for coil angle range of 10° 14° for bare package diameter of 69 mm to build packages up to 200 mm and different yarn displacements (0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 mm).
When bare 82 nm diameter HGNS were incubated in various pH solutions, a large shift of the plasmon resonance from 805 to 712 nm was observed.
For PDT, light at 652 nm was delivered by placing a 0.2 mm diameter bare-ended fibre against the tissue.
The CPEs were made from 8T (200 μm bare, 270 μm coated diameter; Experiment 1) or 5T (125 μm bare, 177 μm coated diameter; Experiment 2) Teflon®-coated silver wire (Advent Research Materials, Suffolk, UK).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com