Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
A plant signal identity is used to derive a bank of parameter estimators which are initialized from different parameter subregions.
In the case of the anticipated deteriorations, the proposed AFTC system selects the controller parameters from the bank of control system parameters, according to the current health condition; while in the case of the unanticipated deteriorations, the controller parameters will be determined through the optimization process.
By adding the new set of optimized parameters to the bank of control system parameters, the database of the proposed AFTC system will gradually enrich to cope with a broader range of the engine deteriorations.
In order to design the proposed AFTC system, the parameters of the control system are optimized for a set of predefined deteriorations and through this a bank of control system parameters is created for the anticipated health conditions.
At the core of this solution is a bank of adaptive neural parameter estimators (NPEs) associated with a set of single-parameter fault models.
The proposed technique is based on a bank of adaptive neural parameter estimators (NPE) and a set of parameterized fault models.
Fault diagnosis is accomplished by means of a bank of estimators, which provide estimates of parameters that describe actuator, plant, and sensor faults.
The state estimate is generated by a weighted sum of the estimates produced by the bank of observers and the parameter estimate is selected to be the one that corresponds to the weighted signal with the largest value.
For the codification, spline functions are used to shape the filter banks, which allows reducing the number of parameters to optimise.
CompCode (competitive code) proposed by Kong et al. [30] is generated by applying a bank of Gabor filters with orientation parameters.
But when multiple examiners mark each bank's performance against others on all manner of parameters, potential weaknesses become easier to detect.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com