Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
We assume that b1 is the bandwidth of a type 1 service, b2 is the bandwidth of a type 2 service, and b 2 * is the bandwidth of a type 2* service.
Similar(59)
Table 3 Simulation parameters Variables Values MAC type 802.11 Packet size 1 KB Bandwidth of links Actual bandwidth of a link Radio type Half duplex Crossover rate 0.1 to 0.9 Mutation rate 0.01 to 0.09 Generations 1000 Elitism True/false Population size 500 and 1000 Network nodes 50 and 100 Selection methods Roulette wheel and tournament.
In Equations (17) and (18), i denotes the type of service, j the index of the connections of that service type, k the index of packets in the queue of that connection, MRR i req is the minimum required bandwidth of service type i, and MLTR i req is the required bandwidth to meet the delay requirement of real time traffic (e.g., rtPS).
This is because the bandwidth of type 1 service handover connection requests is lower than that of type 2 services.
In CACP [4], the authors differentiate two types of bandwidth: the available local available bandwidth of a node based on the CITR which considers interference issue and the available bandwidth of a node which considers both blocking and interference issues.
Interestingly, the spectral bandwidth of the type-II transition is much narrower than the spectral bandwidth of the type-I transition.
Table 1: Effective bandwidth of a transoceanic link.
Although wide-band phase nonreciprocal gyrators12 can be engineered to enhance the bandwidth of such systems, this type of non-reciprocal devices is inherently frequency dependent.
where W c l is the bandwidth of the channel of type l, n0 is the power of the additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN), PT is the transmission power for SU and G is the channel gain.
Moreover, a variable bandwidth instead of a constant bandwidth is considered in the local maximum likelihood type estimators.
This is because nodesize acts as a type of bandwidth parameter that controls the level of smoothing of the RF predictor.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com