Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Loci for which less than half of the plants per generation had interpretable banding patterns were regarded as missing data.
Similar(59)
Other patterns are regarded as negative.
One sample from each banding patterns were sequenced.
The resulting RFLP banding patterns were compared visually.
The fine banding patterns were, in both cases, similar to the fine cpDNA banding patterns from other species typical for digested cpDNA (Fig. 1).
Banding patterns were analyzed visually.
Identical banding patterns were called pulsotypes.
The PCR banding patterns were scored 1 5.
The amplified banding patterns were scored as 'A' for ICCV-2 type banding pattern, 'B' for JG-62 type banding pattern and 'H' for heterozygous loci.
The chromosome number and banding patterns were analyzed with a 300 500 band resolution.
Banding patterns were compared with 3.0% optimization and 2.5% band position tolerance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com