Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(6)
The resultant band patterns were compared with a standard astaxanthin sample originated from Haematococcus pluvialis.
The band patterns were compared using the Dice-coefficient by using the unweighted pair group method to determine band similarity.
The band patterns were compared visually.
Band patterns were compared using Gelcompar II (Applied Maths, Belgium).
The RFLP band patterns were compared by using the BioNumerics software package version 5.1 (Applied Maths, Kortrijk, Belgium).
The band patterns were compared by means of the Dice coefficient by using the unweighted pair-group method to determine band similarity and following the criteria established by Tenover et al. to define the pulsed-field type clusters (16 ).
Similar(54)
The resulting RFLP banding patterns were compared visually.
After ethidium bromide staining, banding patterns were compared visually.
Banding patterns were compared with 3.0% optimization and 2.5% band position tolerance.
Banding patterns were compared based on visual inspection of the ethidium bromide-stained gels.
Banding patterns were compared with those of the library of PCR ribotypes at the ARL, Cardiff [ 13].
More suggestions(15)
band patterns were visualized
band patterns were grouped
band patterns were analyzed
band patterns were scored
band patterns were observed
band patterns were selected
band patterns were imported
band frequencies were compared
band patterns were developed
band patterns were converted
band patterns were done
band patterns were considered
band patterns were digitalized
band patterns were obtained
band patterns were denatured
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com