Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
In addition, in retrieval phase, CC was found to be lower in the bad navigator compared to the good navigator.
Similar(59)
However, in the Enc phase, range of dispersion was higher for the bad navigators compared to the good navigators.
This, in turn, explained the larger range of dispersion during the Enc phase in the bad navigators compared to the good navigators, whereas similar relations were established during the Ret phase in both the groups.
During the Nav phase, CC was found to be significantly lower in the good navigator compared to the bad navigator, F 1, 84) = 10.86, p < 0.01.
However, there are more translations rated as "bad" or "very bad" compared to the UMLS-based approach.
That is, a teacher from a bad school will be significantly happier to match with a bad school compared to a teacher from a good school.
Moreover, DEX cotreatment reduced Bad expression compared to PAN alone.
"It's not bad compared to Europe, but it's bad compared to South Korea".
It was noticed that the CC in the Nav phase for the bad navigators was significantly lower compared to the good navigator, F 1, 84) = 9.0, p$< $0.011.
It's not bad compared to what they had before.
These people have it so bad compared to me".
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com