bad introduction

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "bad introduction" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe an introduction that is poorly executed or ineffective in setting the stage for what follows. Example: "The speaker's bad introduction left the audience confused about the topic of the presentation."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

It is not a bad introduction to the place.

The Economist

Reading, study, silence, thought are a bad introduction to loquacity".

The New York Times - Books

"It's such a bad introduction because it eliminates romance and love.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

"It's a bad introduction for something I don't know yet," he told me, and shook his head.

The New York Times

Personally, I do not think they are such a bad introduction to what he is all about.

The New Yorker

William Hazlitt, a Krystal favorite cited in no fewer than five of the 12 essays, buttresses this argument: "Reading, study, silence, thought are a bad introduction to loquacity".

The New York Times - Books

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

I'm so bad at introductions.

The New Yorker

But including bad product introductions and wars, we have many examples of bad data causing big mistakes.

The New York Times

"You can certainly delay in bad times the introduction of new capital costs, but you can't postpone them indefinitely," he said.

The New York Times

It was nearly as bad as the introduction of Saturn division's larger LS.

Forbes

It's not a bad choice for an introduction.

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the specific failings of an introduction, be precise; detail whether it was disorganized, irrelevant, or poorly delivered.

Common error

Avoid simply stating that something is a "bad introduction". Instead, elaborate on why it's ineffective by identifying the specific issues, like a lack of clarity or missing context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "bad introduction" functions primarily as a descriptive expression. It serves to negatively characterize the quality or effectiveness of an introductory segment, whether it be in writing, speech, or any other form of presentation. Ludwig AI highlights its usability in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Academia

15%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "bad introduction" serves as a straightforward descriptor for an opening that fails to meet expectations, encompassing issues of clarity, relevance, and engagement. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically sound and usable across varied contexts. While direct, it benefits from further elaboration on the specific failings to enhance its critical value. The phrase is most commonly found in News & Media, followed by Academia and Science. Alternatives like "poor beginning" and "ineffective opening" offer similar meanings, allowing for nuanced expression. To improve writing, avoid generalizations and pinpoint the specific shortcomings of the introduction. Overall, "bad introduction" is a functional phrase that serves as a starting point for more in-depth critique.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

poor beginning

Focuses on the quality of the start itself, emphasizing its deficiency.

unfavorable start

Highlights the negative implications or consequences of the initial stage.

ineffective opening

Emphasizes the lack of impact or desired outcome of the introductory part.

flawed commencement

Highlights imperfections or errors present from the very beginning.

weak launch

Conveys a lack of strength or impact in the initial presentation or start.

inauspicious start

Indicates that the beginning is not promising or likely to lead to success.

disadvantageous start

Highlights how the initial stage puts someone or something at a disadvantage.

unsuccessful launch

Focuses specifically on the failure to successfully initiate something.

subpar opening

Indicates the introduction is below the expected or desired standard.

deficient beginning

Emphasizes the lack of necessary qualities or components in the starting phase.

FAQs

How can I avoid giving a "bad introduction"?

To avoid giving a "bad introduction", ensure clarity, relevance, and engagement. Start with a strong hook, clearly state your purpose, and connect with your audience. Practice and seek feedback to refine your delivery.

What are some signs of a "bad introduction"?

Signs of a "bad introduction" include confusing or irrelevant opening remarks, a lack of clear purpose, disengaged audience members, and failure to establish a connection with the subject matter.

What can I say instead of "bad introduction"?

You can use alternatives like "poor beginning", "ineffective opening", or "unfavorable start" depending on the specific context.

Is it always negative to describe something as a "bad introduction"?

Yes, describing something as a "bad introduction" carries a negative connotation. It suggests that the beginning was flawed, ineffective, or otherwise undesirable. The alternatives of "bad introduction" such as "poor beginning" or "ineffective opening", maintain the negative connotation.