Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(4)
Exact(20)
We were completely shocked, this concept of "bad evidence" shocked the pants off us.
Much bad policy is based on bad evidence, and rigorous research can expose that.
It is wrong to waste precious resources, or lives, because of bad evidence.
Can't members of Congress who believed the bad evidence enough to vote us into war also experience regret?
Are we really saying that bad evidence — or no evidence — is a good reason to lock someone up indefinitely?
Bad evidence becomes good; if Simpson's own tests fail to exonerate him, the defense can argue that it was because it was not given access to adequate raw material.
Similar(40)
Levitt said: "In 2005 the law was changed to allow what is called bad character evidence, which is evidence that somebody has done something so similar or of the same type of offence on another occasion.
In Bad Taste: Evidence for the Oral Origins of Moral Disgust.
This sort of testimony is known in the courts as "prior bad acts" evidence.
The problem with these laws with respect to bad scientific evidence is that science doesn't operate on deadlines.
Be clear about why the policy you are challenging is bad and evidence the impact it will have.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com