Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
bad effects
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
"bad effects" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe the negative outcomes of a particular action. For example, "The industrial revolution had many bad effects on the environment."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Were there bad effects?
News & Media
And any bad effects were Obama's fault.
News & Media
Anyway, all sorts of protected speech have bad effects.
News & Media
Worse still, "kindness motivated by empathy often has bad effects".
News & Media
However, even positive maternal transferences can have bad effects.
News & Media
"Its bad effects cannot be escaped by the rich.
News & Media
But it might also have longer-term bad effects.
News & Media
"Also, it will have good and bad effects".
News & Media
In fact, the bad effects of mimicking 3GL languages in SQL are magnified.
But they also show how having the right attitude can mitigate bad effects.
Might the virulence of the negative PR have bad effects, no matter what?
Academia
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When discussing the impact of a decision or action, use "bad effects" to clearly denote the negative consequences. For instance, "The new policy had several "bad effects" on employee morale."
Common error
While "bad effects" is generally acceptable, consider using more precise or formal alternatives like "adverse consequences" or "detrimental impacts" in academic or professional writing to enhance clarity and sophistication.
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "bad effects" functions primarily as a noun phrase, typically serving as the object of a verb or preposition. It describes the negative consequences or outcomes resulting from a particular action, situation, or condition. As indicated by Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
35%
Science
30%
Academia
20%
Less common in
Wiki
7%
Formal & Business
5%
Reference
3%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "bad effects" is a common and grammatically sound way to describe negative outcomes. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a usable phrase in written English, although more formal alternatives might be preferred in certain contexts. Its frequency across news, science, and academic sources indicates its versatility and broad understanding. To enhance clarity and sophistication in writing, consider alternatives like "adverse consequences" or "detrimental impacts", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Using "bad effects" effectively involves understanding its communicative purpose: to inform, warn, or express concern about undesirable results.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
negative consequences
Replaces "bad" with "negative" and "effects" with "consequences", emphasizing the adverse results.
adverse outcomes
Substitutes "bad" with "adverse" and "effects" with "outcomes", conveying a sense of unfavorable results.
harmful repercussions
Replaces "bad" with "harmful" and "effects" with "repercussions", highlighting the damaging consequences.
detrimental impacts
Substitutes "bad" with "detrimental" and "effects" with "impacts", suggesting a negative influence or effect.
unfavorable outcomes
Replaces "bad" with "unfavorable", indicating results that are not desirable or positive.
ill effects
Uses "ill" as a synonym for "bad", keeping the word "effects" which implies negative results.
adverse consequences
Combines "adverse" and "consequences" offering a slightly more formal tone to express negative outcomes.
negative impacts
Swaps "bad" for "negative" and "effects" with "impacts", focusing on the measureable influence.
unpleasant results
Replaces "bad" with "unpleasant" and "effects" with "results", suggesting outcomes that are disagreeable.
damaging consequences
Emphasizes the harm caused by the consequences using "damaging" instead of "bad".
FAQs
How can I use "bad effects" in a sentence?
You can use "bad effects" to describe the negative consequences of something. For example: "The lack of exercise had "bad effects" on his health", or "The economic crisis had "bad effects" on small businesses".
What are some alternatives to "bad effects"?
Alternatives to "bad effects" include "negative consequences", "adverse outcomes", or "harmful repercussions".
Is it always appropriate to use "bad effects" in formal writing?
While "bad effects" is generally understandable, it may be more suitable to use alternatives like "detrimental impacts" or "unfavorable outcomes" in formal writing to convey a more precise and professional tone.
What is the difference between "bad effects" and "side effects"?
"Side effects" typically refer to unintended consequences of a treatment or medication, while "bad effects" is a broader term encompassing any negative outcomes regardless of the cause. "Bad effects" may refer to outcomes beyond health or medical contexts, unlike the more specific term of "side effects".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested