Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(5)
The bad amendments, all from Republicans, would have: undercut Clean Air Act protections against mercury and other toxic pollutants from industrial boilers; opened up all of America's outer continental shelf, as well as the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, to oil drilling; and overturned President Obama's wise decision to delay the environmentally risky Keystone XL oil pipeline.
The problem lies in two other, very bad amendments that were added to the appropriations bill on the House floor.
Don't block Obama, but find ways to compromise with him without adding bad amendments to otherwise good legislature.
We worked night and day to improve it and to block bad amendments, with the help of grassroots bankers across the country, who we estimate have sent 300,000 letters to Congress this year.
As long as Republicans are interested in opening the door to the process, it might as well be opened all the way and finally wipe those "bad" Amendments off the books.
Similar(55)
A bad amendment passed again is still a bad amendment.
Republicans were trying to force Democrats into "bad votes" on amendments (point-scoring for the minority).
Too bad the 25th Amendment had not yet been passed!
By "bad faith," the amendment has always been understood to mean that a defendant could be compensated if the prosecution behaved unethically even when its case was legitimate.
Wolff recounts discussions in the White House about whether the situation was "Twenty-fifth Amendment bad," referring to the part of the Constitution that could, in theory, be used to remove Trump if his Cabinet, Vice-President, and also (if Trump objects to their assessment) Congress conclude he has become unable to discharge his duties.
Bad for Second Amendment, brah".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com