Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(25)
The Log10 transformation of bacterial count was done, before the analysis.
Total Bacterial Count was made by incubating cultured dilutions of milk samples on Plate Count Agar (Oxoid, England) plates.
The bacterial count was interpreted as those having above and below recommended level as described by Council Directives 92/46/EEC 19922).
Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test, and the percentage reduction in bacterial count was calculated by the following equation: Percentage reduction in bacterial count % = viable CFU in an hour − viable CFU in 24 h viable CFU in an hour × 100 Open image in new window (1).
The current study revealed mean bacterial counts lower than this standard in which the mean ± standard error (SE) bacterial count was 4.59 ± 0.12 log10 cfu/ml from milk collected directly from teat and 4.77 + 0.23 log10 cfu/ml in milk collected from milking buckets slightly higher than the standard given.
The finding that the bacterial count was higher in patients who were culture positive compared with those who were culture negative was intuitive.
Similar(35)
Intestinal lesion score and bacterial count were analysed on d 16.
Also, the total organic carbon (TOC), surfactants (SUR), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD), and total bacterial count were reduced when SF-1, SF-2, and SF-3 were used.
Colony formations are done by using 50 mm sample and the bacterial count is in colony forming unit (CFU/100 mL).
No significant differences in bacterial count were observed among different organic formulations prepared and used in this study.
Total aerobic bacterial count is also recorded.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com