Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
backing evidence
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "backing evidence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to evidence that supports a claim or argument in a discussion or analysis. Example: "In her research paper, she provided backing evidence to strengthen her thesis on climate change."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
They invariably hold back evidence.
News & Media
Prosecutors have often faced a harrowing choice between blowing sources and holding back evidence.
News & Media
One thing was clear from the back-to-back evidence yesterday of the prime minister and the chairman of the BBC, Gavyn Davies.
News & Media
The spacecraft managed to beam back evidence of the carbon and hydrogen containing chemicals shortly before it entered hibernation mode to conserve falling power supplies.
News & Media
The Challenger's crew not only brought back evidence of life in the abyss, they changed forever the way we perceive and use the sea.
News & Media
Chief U.N. arms inspector Hans Blix Monday criticized Iraq for holding back evidence on its past weapons-of-mass-destruction programs.
News & Media
I asked the source whether Mac felt he needed to bring back evidence of what he saw.
News & Media
One of the largest trials in our review came to an explicit conclusion that mechanisms to feed back evidence about outcomes to partners was " the most important factor [for sustainability], cited in four of the five IMPACT study sites".
Science
Evidence must be located, not created, and opinions not backed by evidence cannot be given much weight".
News & Media
A feel for the likelihood of 'new product' success can, and should be, backed by evidence of demand.
News & Media
The research backs previous evidence that more than 150,000 political prisoners are being held in North Korea.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "backing evidence", ensure that the evidence is directly relevant to the claim or argument being made. Clearly explain how the evidence supports your point.
Common error
Avoid exaggerating the significance of the "backing evidence". Clearly define the scope of support provided by the evidence and acknowledge any limitations.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "backing evidence" functions as a noun phrase, where "backing" acts as a gerund modifying the noun "evidence". It describes evidence that supports or substantiates a claim or argument. Ludwig AI indicates that this is a grammatically correct phrase.
Frequent in
News & Media
30%
Science
35%
Formal & Business
10%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
5%
Wiki
10%
Social Media
10%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "backing evidence" is a grammatically sound noun phrase used to describe evidence that supports a particular claim. According to Ludwig AI, it's a valid and usable expression. While not extremely common, it appears in various contexts, including news, science, and formal writing. The phrase serves to strengthen arguments and provide justification, with its formality varying based on the source. Alternatives like "supporting evidence" can be used, but the choice depends on the specific nuance intended.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
supporting evidence
Focuses on the act of providing support through evidence.
corroborating evidence
Emphasizes the confirmation of existing evidence.
substantiating evidence
Highlights the act of proving or validating something with evidence.
validating evidence
Focuses on confirming the accuracy or truth of evidence.
confirming evidence
Highlights the act of verifying something with evidence.
evidence in support
Rephrases to emphasize that the evidence is providing support.
evidence that supports
Rephrases to emphasize the evidence's role in support.
proof to back up
Uses "proof" instead of "evidence" and emphasizes the act of backing up.
data to support
Uses "data" which could be interpreted as evidence.
justifying evidence
Highlights the act of showing or proving something to be right or reasonable with evidence.
FAQs
How to use "backing evidence" in a sentence?
"Backing evidence" is used to describe facts or data that support a claim or argument. For example: "The scientist presented "backing evidence" from multiple studies to support their hypothesis."
What is a good alternative to "backing evidence"?
Alternatives to "backing evidence" include "supporting evidence", "corroborating evidence", or "substantiating evidence". The best choice depends on the specific context.
Which is correct: "backing evidence" or "backed evidence"?
"Backing evidence" (present participle) refers to the act of providing support, while "backed evidence" (past participle) describes evidence that has already been supported. The choice depends on the intended meaning.
What's the difference between "backing evidence" and "evidence backing"?
"Backing evidence" emphasizes the evidence itself as supportive. "Evidence backing" (something) emphasizes the evidence's role in supporting something else. For instance, "evidence backing this claim".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested