Sentence examples for background rates for the from inspiring English sources

Former disease codes of the comparison external background rates for the GDR were re-coded via earlier ICD revisions to the 10th ICD code, 39 which was applied throughout.

The background rates for the P generations varied from 5.9% to 13.0% with a mean value of 8.2%, whereas the F1 generation background rate varied from 1.4%too 19.8% with a mean value of 13.5%.

However, since we selected these genes based on the total number of mutations occurring in each gene, the estimated background rates for these genes may be biased.

Following this logic, we defined background ILI prevalence as the average prevalence from the initially less affected boroughs, Bronx, Manhattan and Staten Island from the first survey, overall and by age group, and assumed the same background rate for the entire survey period.

However, the mefloquine group had a significantly higher proportion of spontaneous abortions (9.1% vs 2.6%), although this was still within the background rate for the population studied.

However, a majority of the sub-clades (both terminal and more basal clades) have higher diversification rates than the background rate for the Furnariidae at both low and intermediate extinction rates.

However, as several sub-clades (both terminal and more basal clades) have higher diversification rates than the background rate for the Furnariidae, the observed high diversification for the synallaxines is not driven by a particular sub-clade nested within the synallaxines.

As we primarily were interested to investigate if the synallaxine clade has an excessively higher rate of diversification compared to the background rate for the Furnariidae, we also calculated diversification rates for larger sub-clades nested within the synallaxines (the sub-clades for which diversification rates have been calculated are given in Table 1).

We obtained a net diversification rate for the crown group of core ruschioids of 4.44 (2.12 19.03) sp Myr−1 using the younger calibration age, or 3.30 (1.77–11.90) sp Myr−1 using the older calibration age; the net rate for the core ruschioids has been at least four times faster than the background rate for the family (Table  2).

Figure 1b f shows the background rates for all the 100 Gaussian-type synthetic catalogs, estimated using the non-stationary ETAS models listed in Table 1.

In other settings, with higher background rates for twins, the effects of our empowerment strategy might be even more substantial.