Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(26)
Note that on the left-hand axis of Figure 3, GCR counts decrease going up the axis in order to show the relationship with temperature, since fewer GCRs hypothetically means fewer clouds, less reflected sunlight, and higher temperatures.
The observed event miss-ratios (shown in axis of Figure 8(b)) always remain below the required event miss-ratios (illustrated in axis of Figure 8(b)).
On the left axis of Figure 3b, the variation of B with QW thickness is plotted, as extracted from fits in Figure 2b.
(c) Mixture partials are generated according to, where varies between zero and one and represents the dominance of source, as represented in the horizontal axis of Figure 5.
The vertical axis of Figure 3 corresponds to the inverse of the periodicity (i.e., 0.1 corresponds to a 10-year periodicity).
The upper bound used in each experiment for the differential data values are shown in the axis of Figure 9(c).
Similar(34)
GSR exhibits greater routing overhead than TFOR and E-GyTAR (note that the y-axis of Figure 11 is on a logarithmic scale).
Since we were unable to have a standard reference for carbon concentration analysis available for the SIMS measurements, the y-axis of Figure 6 was set as the number of counts.
Note that by scaling the x-axis of Figure 15 (b) by the number of TFs (266) one gets an estimate of the number of regulators per gene.
The Overall landscape is based on the significant correlations computed across all 26 treatments (as denoted on the x-axis of Figure 1, top left panel).
For each of the 5,123 probes, we computed both the Pearson correlation (x-axis of Figure 3) and the Spearman correlation (y-axis of Figure 3) of each probe profile with the Jensen-Shannon divergence having as probability distribution of reference that of a metastasis profile (these values are called JSM2-Pearson and JSM2-Spearman in the accompanying Excel file provided).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com