awards of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "awards of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the types or categories of awards given in a specific context, such as competitions or recognitions. Example: "The awards of excellence were presented to the top performers in the annual competition."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

National Awards: awards of a national and/or interdisciplinary nature.

University of California, Berkeley

The brothers have won awards of their own.

The New York Times - Sports

She will receive one of five awards of $250,000.

The New York Times

They all deserved awards of A: for aplomb.

The New York Times - Arts

ACADEMY AWARDS OF MERIT Digidesign and Bill Tondreau.

The New York Times - Arts

Another 37 groups will get awards of $75,000 each.

The New York Times - Arts

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

5 human-written examples

At the ARIA Music Awards of 1995, the band won five awards out of nine nominations.

Wikipedia

The judge is expected to rule shortly on awards of back pay.

The New York Times

What is left, then, from the Academy Awards of 2013?

The New Yorker

Zvyagintsev will be under no such restrictions for the Academy Awards, of course.

The New Yorker

You didn't hear that [at the Academy Awards], of course.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "awards of" to specify categories or types of recognitions, like "awards of excellence" or "awards of merit".

Common error

Avoid using "awards for" when specifying types of awards. "Awards for" typically indicates the reason or purpose of an award, not its category. Instead of "awards for excellence", use "awards of excellence".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "awards of" functions as a prepositional phrase often used to specify categories or types of awards. Ludwig AI shows that it commonly precedes a noun, defining the kind of recognition being bestowed.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Academia

22%

Wiki

13%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Science

12%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "awards of" is a common and grammatically correct way to specify categories or types of recognitions. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is most frequently found in news and media sources, academic writing, and on Wikipedia. When specifying award categories, be careful not to confuse "awards of" with similar phrases such as "awards for", as "awards of" classifies while "awards for" indicates purpose. Knowing how to properly use "awards of" ensures clear and precise communication, particularly when discussing different types of recognition.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

award for

This alternative replaces "of" with "for", focusing on the purpose or reason behind the award.

prizes for

Substitutes "awards" with "prizes", emphasizing the competitive aspect and tangible rewards.

recipients of

Shifts the focus from the awards themselves to the individuals or entities receiving them.

grants for

Replaces "awards" with "grants", indicating financial assistance provided for a specific purpose.

honors for

Substitutes "awards" with "honors", highlighting recognition and prestige.

recognitions for

Uses "recognitions" instead of "awards", emphasizing acknowledgment of achievement or merit.

tributes to

Replaces "awards" with "tributes", suggesting acts of respect or admiration.

decorations for

Substitutes "awards" with "decorations", often used in military or ceremonial contexts.

achievements in

This alternative focuses on the achievements that warrant an award, rather than the award itself.

rewards for

Replaces "awards" with "rewards", emphasizing the benefits or compensation associated with achievement.

FAQs

How can I use "awards of" in a sentence?

Use "awards of" to specify categories or types of recognitions. For example, "The ceremony featured several "awards of excellence"".

What is a good alternative to "awards of"?

Depending on the context, alternatives include "prizes for", "grants for", or "recognitions for". These options shift the emphasis slightly but maintain a similar meaning.

Is it correct to say "awards for excellence"?

While understandable, "awards of excellence" is more precise when referring to the name or type of award. "Awards for excellence" implies the awards are given because of excellence.

What's the difference between "awards of merit" and "awards for merit"?

"Awards of merit" refers to awards named "merit awards". "Awards for merit" refers to awards given because of someone's merit. The former is a category, the latter is a reason.