The phrase "avoidance significantly" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing the degree or impact of avoidance behavior or strategies in various fields such as psychology, health, or conflict resolution.
Example: "The study found that avoidance significantly reduced the participants' anxiety levels over time."
Alternatives: "avoidance greatly" or "avoidance markedly".
Results show that specific temperament traits, such as Reward Dependence and Harm Avoidance, significantly predict the perception of Uncertainty, the sense of Helplessness, the attitude of Persistence, and Fantasy regarding external solutions.
The PIPS subscale Avoidance significantly predicted pain-related disability even after controlling for catastrophizing and fear of movement.
With regards to TCI-R significant changes at t1 were found in three dimensions: Novelty Seeking and Self-Directedness significantly increased while Harm Avoidance significantly decreased.
Hence, increasing levels of Partner Support and Other Support significantly reduced the likelihood of having a long PD, whereas increasing levels of Other Avoidance significantly increased the likelihood of having a long PD in female cancer patients.
Our previous work suggested, however, that social avoidance was significantly greater after inescapable defeat.
In the inhibitory avoidance, AMPH significantly decreased the change from training to test when compared to saline.
Baseline experiential avoidance was significantly associated both the extent to which a student engaged in, and was the victim of, both relational and physical aggression.
Interestingly, a combined treatment of SB-271046 with an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor produced an additive increase in passive avoidance and significantly reversed scopolamine-induced amnesic effects [ 41].
The AAAQ resolved/regulated subscale ("avoidance") was not significantly correlated with either the "avoidance" or "approach avoidance" SRC task bias scores, although this AAAQ subscale was significantly negatively correlated with the SRC task "approach" bias score.
Uncertainty avoidance level decreased significantly (higher positive score) from pretest to posttest, while system quality increased.
Economic evaluation results indicate that although hydrogen cost increases with power co-generation (5 8%), the CO2 avoidance cost is significantly lower than in power plants alone (73 83% lower).
