The phrase "avoidance game" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts discussing strategies or behaviors aimed at evading certain situations or responsibilities.
Example: "In negotiations, playing the avoidance game can lead to missed opportunities for resolution."
Alternatives: "evasion tactic" or "avoidance strategy".
Instead, the flinty Texan should borrow Nathan Detroit's double-breasted pinstripes to come ashore from the newest established permanent floating avoidance game in New York.
So we don't need any more tax returns to know that Mr. Romney is an Olympic-level athlete at the tax avoidance game.
To go back to the VAT-free builder's bill, the very fact the offer is on the table proves that plenty of other people are playing the avoidance game.
This is foolish public policy, considering that even if they play the tax-avoidance game legally, they owe Canada and their respective homelands.
Amazon's employees are too scattered, its customer base and its sales too large and the states' fiscal crisis too grave for it to continue to play tax-avoidance games.
"We're in the game of avoidance".
Art happens in front of that door, always, an intricate game of avoidance of its terrors.
In decentralized spectrum sharing, carrier sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA) protocols and game-theory-based distributed decision making protocols have been studied in [19, 20].
Momani said G20 governments were still at the stage of discovery on matters of multinational corporate tax and needed to "change the rules of the game" because tax avoidance is completely legal.
Alternatively, tax personal incomes net of saving: this way, the "progressivity" of a consumption-tax system can be fine-tuned.Getting rid of corporate taxes would save the vast sums spent by taxmen and firms in the cat-and-mouse game of tax avoidance.
Such avoidance behaviors are predicted by game-theoretical models because individuals should be less likely to engage in aggressive interactions if it is known beforehand that they are likely to lose the encounter (Maynard-Smith 1982).
