The phrase "avoid the premise" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing arguments, logic, or reasoning, indicating that one should not consider the initial assumption or basis of a discussion.
Example: "In order to reach a more objective conclusion, we must avoid the premise that all participants have equal knowledge."
Alternatives: "disregard the assumption" or "steer clear of the foundation".
The essence of his theory of drama, as revealed in this work, is the idea that a truly Marxist drama must avoid the Aristotelian premise that the audience should be made to believe that what they are witnessing is happening here and now.
The larger point, however, is that in its zeal to criminalize the harder-to-define aspects of deplorable practices like corruption and support for terrorism, Congress must avoid undermining the premise of our rule of law: that our laws define clearly the conduct they make criminal.
In this way we supposedly avoid altogether the premise that existence is a perfection.
In this way Harclay can keep premise (1) and by side-stepping premise (2), avoid the conclusion in (4).
The design studio behind Salchiboxto, Arquimaña (on commission from the BISTRÓ Guggenehim Bilboa), talks with The Creators Project about the aesthetic details: "The stall had to fulfill some very clear premises, avoid the archetype of a typical hot dog cart and evoque the essence of the crafted products with a balance of tradition and modernity.
The design studio behind Salchiboxto, Arquimaña (on commission from the Guggenehim), talks with The Creators Project about the aesthetic details: "The stall had to fulfill some very clear premises, avoid the archetype of a typical hot dog cart and evoque the essence of the crafted products with a balance of tradition and modernity.
Since Dr. Old and Dr. Boyse's discovery, vaccine research has focused on the premise that tumors avoid the body's immune response by hiding their cell surface markers.
What is required to avoid the fallacy is to verify independently that each of the original premises is true.
A fashionable approach in the academic humanities right now is "posthumanism," which seeks to avoid the premise popular during the Enlightenment, but questionable based on present knowledge that there's something magical in humanness.
If it means 'shares no parts or constituents with', then Premise 4 avoids the counterexample given above, but Premise 3 ceases to be plausible, since s1 and s2 do plausibly share a constituent, namely r.
There's no avoiding the fact that the entire premise of many sex-depression works are loaded with moral assumptions.
