Sentence examples for avoid data duplication from inspiring English sources
Care was taken to avoid data duplication.
When studies from the same research group with overlapped population were found, only the one with larger population was included to avoid data duplication.
They have been excluded from the relevant analyses to avoid data duplication; this circumstance is detailed in Table S4 in Additional data file 1, where raw genotype data from each sample collection are reported.
To avoid data duplication, if the user has an unix account on the NG6 server, the software provides the possibility to create symbolic links between the data files and his home directory.
Because the systematic review reported data at all follow-up intervals per trial, only events with the longest follow-up period per trial were selected for analysis, in order to avoid data duplication.
The aim of this study was 1) to include structural MRI studies systematically comparing unipolar depression with bipolar disorder and healthy volunteers; 2) to consider all available structures of interest without specific age limits, avoiding data duplication, and 3) to explore the influence of factors contributing to the measured effect sizes systematically with meta-regression analyses.
Each positive influenza test result is investigated as to whether it represents a hospitalization event; this process helps avoid data entry duplication.
An automated migration helps to avoid data mixing and duplications.
When these techniques are used to preserve the copyright ownership with the purpose of avoiding unauthorized data duplications, the embedded watermark should be detectable.
This would make collecting data on CE simpler, as it would eliminate the need to evaluate and integrate data from all regions, avoid duplication of data from patients who access several different health facilities over time, bypass conflict between inpatient and outpatient data, and make both clinical and epidemiological data accessible to clinicians, epidemiologists, and policymakers.
In addition Reviewers #2 and #3 flag up the problem of how to avoid duplication of data in your two manuscripts, while nevertheless giving eLife readers sufficient data to enable them to evaluate your findings without having to refer to the Coon et al paper.
