Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The values (AVG) of each band were calculated as IND/AREA, where AREA is the size of the region that was measured.
Similar(59)
Strongest since mid-2011, but still below pre-crisis avg of 5%pic.twitter.com/r3lkxM9Fnww September 26 , 2013Noble Francis (@NobleFrancis) #ONS UK GDP in Q2 unchanged at 0.7%, still 3.3% lower than at pre-recession peak.
Table 5 Random topology accuracy results Measured entity No RTS/CTS With RTS/CTS Avg of (Ocl - fp)/fp 0.000077 0.183 Std.
2) Statistics: The maximum fitness f max, minimum fitness f min, the sum of fitness ∑f, and average fitness f avg of this generation are calculated.
The observations of the Fig. 18 are: ① the U avg of NHWOW is increasing slowly with the distance D and WTs may experience 100% healthy wind flow after the 15D spacing; ② the U avg of NHWW is reached 98.8% at 6D and 100% at 7D spacing.
The observations of Fig. 20 are: ① the U avg of HRWOW is increasing slowly with the distance D and WTs may experience 99% healthy wind flow at 15D spacing; ② the U avg of HRWW is reached 98.4% at 6D and 100% at 7D spacing.
No significant differences in both the ratio of ΔG avg of genes and intergenic regions and ΔG avg of sense/antisense RNA/DNA duplexes were observed (Table S1 and S4).
There appears to be a general trend of increased mRNA level with increasing ΔG avg of the ORFs.
There is a strong statistically significant difference between ΔG avg of sense and potential antisense RNA/DNA duplexes in ORFs (Tables 4, S1 and S3).
Our results showed that the mean value of ΔG of the 3'-regulatory sequences (32.41 kcal/mol) is comparable to the mean value of ΔG avg of the 3'-IGRs and is significantly lower than ΔG avg of the genes (Tables 2 and S3). S. cerevisiae genome contains 264 genes with introns.
Unlike ORFs, the ratio of ΔG avg of potential sense and antisense RNA/DNA duplexes in 3'-IGRs is nearly equal (50.57% of the sense duplexes are more stable than the potential antisense duplexes) (Tables 4 and S4).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com