Exact(1)
Figure 3A shows a dimensionless description of effective optical sampling depth, given here as 〈 Z MC〉/ d f, plotted vs. μ′ s, avgd f, with μ′ s, avg calculated as the average of μ′ s(λ x) and μ′ s(λ m) for each measurement.
Similar(59)
These Ct values were averaged and the difference between the 18S Ct (Avg) and the gene of interest Ct (Avg) was calculated (Ct-diff).
These Ct values were averaged and the difference between the GAPDH Ct (Avg) and the gene of interest Ct (Avg) was calculated (Ct-diff).
The average pore diameters (d avg) were calculated from Eq. (1) (Singh et al. 2012).
But considering that T avg is calculated as the average of T min and T max and given that the effect of T max was not significant we think the significant effects of T avg found here are the result of strong correlation between T min and T avg (R2 = 0.84) and not an effect of T avg per-se.
The remaining frequency profiles were tested in the second step and accepted if the following logical expression is true: (3) 0.4 < L 2 / L i For the selected frequency profiles the average (Avg) were calculated using the corresponding raw count values of the L 2 to L i list elements and the ln(Avg/Min) values were tabulated with the head and tail motif (spanion).
i : ith value m: measured c: calculated avg: average.
On this image, the average difference (avg dif) was calculated on areas devoid of flashes.
Comparison of group A and B (G = A or B), the average methylation level (AVG R,G) was calculated separately at two groups in a given region R (which includes m bin size, and start at the sth bin).
EJTT is calculated by avg.
The D50, D70, D90, maximum and average tumor dose (D avg), and V100 were calculated for each tumor since these metrics were previously validated as prognostic indices for radioembolization [9], where D50 and D90 are the minimum doses to 50 and 90% of tumor volume and V100 is the percentage of tumor volume receiving more than 100 Gy.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com