Sentence examples for averse values of from inspiring English sources

The results in Column (2) of Table 7 show that entrepreneurs regard the most risk averse values of the scale as being more risk loving than do non-entrepreneurs (positive sign on τ 1 ), while considering the more risk loving values as not being as risk loving as the rest of the population (negative sign on τ 2, τ 3, τ 5 and τ 6 ).

For a moderately infectious disease (represented by p=0.25), there is a positive benefit for lower (more risk averse) values of α, up until a sharp threshold value, after which the outcome is negative.

With a highly risk-averse value of α, regions C and D vanish, and region B (corresponding to the diseases for which the distancing is beneficial) extends from the invasion threshold value of p all the way to p=1.

We find that entrepreneurs inflate the most risk-averse values and undervalue the most risk loving value of the self-evaluation scale, relative to non-entrepreneurs.

A scanned version of "Margin of Safety: Risk-Averse Value Investing Strategies for the Thoughtful Investor" has been circulating around trading floors.

Usually, the performance attributes that correspond to the primary objectives of the project should be assigned a risk-averse value.

Lower values of αrepresent more cautious (more risk-averse) attitudes to risk, and result in a greater reduction of r i for a given Θ.

A very low value of α means highly risk-averse behaviour, causing a strong control response in which susceptible individuals effectively close down all social contacts if there is any hint of disease within their awareness radius, Figure 3. Higher values of α represent more relaxed (less risk-averse) attitudes and will cause a weaker response, particularly at low infection pressure, Θ.

Low values of ϕ describe a situation in which managers are comfortable implementing a harvest regime that risks significant evolutionary change, whereas high values of ϕ magnify the relative importance of evolutionary change to management decision making, and thus describe situations in which managers or other stakeholders are averse to inducing evolutionary change.

Using the observed pattern of static and dynamic benefit incidence to compare the two programs and a uniform transfer, we show that if the middle-income households are sufficiently risk averse the additional insurance value of programs with superior dynamic benefit incidence can alter the median voter outcome in favor of more targeted programs.

Lubetkin et al.[ 14] discussed the possibility that US Asians may be averse to valuing their health at the upper end of the VAS scale and may choose values towards the middle of the scale.