Sentence examples for averse outcomes from inspiring English sources

The software generally requires yes or no answers to questions and is designed to deliver risk averse outcomes when used by non-clinicians.

In addition, according to prospect theory which states that people are loss averse, avoiding a negative outcome is likely more dominant in preference formation compared to trading off a neutral versus a positive outcome [ 23].

Studies have shown that people are regret averse: When choosing they avoid outcomes that they anticipate they will regret (e.g., Josephs, Larrick, Steele, & Nisbett, 1992; Zeelenberg, Beattie, van der Pligt, & de Vries, 1996).

Despite the fact that in RMV many (60%) rich voters do vote their pocketbook, we observe frequent deviations from pocketbook predictions in redistribution outcomes because inequality-averse rich voters are likely to be pivotal in this case.

According to the asymmetry hypothesis, inequality aversion has asymmetric effects on redistribution outcomes in majority voting across treatments because inequality-averse rich voters are more likely to induce redistribution outcomes beyond the pocketbook prediction when the rich are in majority (in RMV) than when the poor are in majority (in PMV).

It is quite often the most sick and high-risk patients who have the most to gain from successful surgery, and yet it is widely accepted that some surgeons have become risk averse to protect their publicly available outcome data.

This is why highly conscientious, risk averse people who consider every potential outcome in advance work as attorneys or airline pilots.

He wasn't averse to theory construction, even if its outcome were potentially revisionary (see e.g., 1957: 1957.

"Many have told us of their daily frustrations with a culture that can be overly bureaucratic, risk averse, hierarchical and too focused on process not outcomes".

The lower panels in Fig. 1 illustrate outcomes when some voters are inequality averse and vote sincerely according to their preference.

The asymmetry hypothesis claims that sincere voting for redistribution beyond the pocketbook by a given share of inequality-averse voters is more or less likely to translate into redistribution outcomes beyond pocketbook interests depending on how likely inequality-averse voters are to be pivotal; pivotality, in turn, depends on the relative strength of income classes.