Concentrations found in the present study appear somewhat comparable to those reported by Wormuth et al. (2006) for fish and for values derived by averaging mean values reported by Wormuth and colleagues for groups of beverages and dairy products; however, Wormuth and colleagues' compilation describes concentrations that are about an order of magnitude higher for meat products for DEHP and DBP.
To evaluate the level of variability of investigated random variables the ratio of standard deviation to the average mean value was calculated.
The result of chloride was ranging from 29 to 155 mg/l with average mean value 54.39 mg/l.
The result of sodium was ranging from 26.43 to 128.83 mg/l with average mean value 50.3 mg/l.
The total average for the NP1 is a low 2.99; the average for NP2 is 4.1, while our STFSyn method reaches a total average mean value of 4.32.
The average mean value for the question "if participants learned new things for Design Patterns" (Qe) was 3.324, with mode value 4 is very encouraging but the high standard deviation attracts the attention for further analysis.
And, for the minimum Δ E a b *, the IB and the LR selected the filter pair (XF2021-XF2012), and the PN and the NN selected the filter pair (XF2021-XF2030) withethe average mean value of 0.448.
Similarly, with the Fujifilm 3D camera system, the IB, the LR and the PN selected the filter pair (XF2026-XF1026), and the NN selected the filter pair (XF2021-XF2203) for the maximum GFC, with the average mean value of 0.998.
For the minimum RMS, the IB, the LR and the PN picked the filter pair (XF2058-XF2021), while the NN picked the filter pair (XF2203-XF2021) withethe average mean value of 0.013.
For the minimum RMS, the IB, the LR and the NN picked the filter pair (XF2009-XF2021), while th PN selected the filter pair (XF2203-XF2021) withethe average mean value of 0.013.
