Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
The phrase "average width for the" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing measurements or dimensions in various contexts, such as design, construction, or data analysis.
Example: "The average width for the new highway lanes will be 12 feet to accommodate larger vehicles."
Alternatives: "typical width for the" or "mean width for the".
Exact(2)
Figure 3 a Ratio between average height and average width for the structures grown on electrodes with different widths are plotted as a solid line in the graph.
We have taken an average value for the variational parameter b ¯ = 0. 3 nm −1, meaning an average width for the two lateral triangular shape wells of 〈z〉=10 12 nm [31].
Similar(58)
The average width of the uncertainty range for changes in flood magnitude is greater for low frequency events than for high frequency events.
For example, the average width of the leg, which can be considered as taxonomically useful character clearly distinguishing the hybrids from the parental species [ 22], varied between 3.18 and 3.48, and between 4.28 and 5.35 in British populations of O. militaris and O. purpurea, respectively, whereas it was 2.98 and 5.46 in this study.
For wide electrodes, the ratio between the average height and the average width of the nanostructures is smaller than for structures grown on narrow electrodes.
Find the average width of the pool.
Estimate the average width of the lake.
The average width of the pool is 18.3 feet.
The average crack width for the cracks, documented on this bridge, ranged between 0.254 and 0.5 mm.
The average radiolucency width for the final horizontal and vertical evaluation using both Pell and Gregory and Winter classifications are shown in Table 5.
From (24), for M=8 we get an average bin width for the Δ′=1.43Δ, This increase in the bin width will result in better detectability of symbols at the receiver.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com