Sentence examples for average wear rates from inspiring English sources

The average wear rates of composite coatings determined by sliding wear test were lower than that of monolithic Al2O3 coating by approximately 40%.

The average wear rates for each material and each maturation medium are shown in Table 2.

The average gravimetric wear rate was 14.5 mg/Mc, whereas volumetric changes in reconstructed µ-CT scans point to an average wear rate of 15.76 mm3/Mc (18.8 mg/Mc).

After 4.5 million cycles of 'mug to mouth', the average wear rate of the test components was 14.3 mm3/million cycles.

The composite coatings with hardness between 976 and 1167 HV exhibited average wear rate between 5.91 and 6.60 × 10−4 mm3 (N m)−1.

The test result showed that the average wear rate of the uncoated blades was 0.86 cm3/ha, while those of the WC/Co and the Al2O3 coatings were 0.02 and 0.90, respectively.

Furthermore, compared with the untreated sample, the average wear rate of the laser shocked samples is decreased by 32.1%, 45.3% and 69.8% corresponding to laser energy of 6.5 J, 8.5 J and 10.5 J, respectively.

The average wear rate of the composite coating is approximately 1.2 1.5 times of that of the single TiN coating and 2.6 2.7 times of that of the TC11 substrate, respectively.

An average wear rate of 5.62 ± 0.53 (standard deviation) mg/million cycles was detected for the vitamin E treated and artificially aged gliding components.

The average wear rate of the cups of 0.08 mm/year is within the normal limits, keeping in mind that wear in younger patients can be 33% to 40% higher than wear in older patients [ 27].

In this study the gliding components had an average wear rate of 5.62 ± 0.53 mg/million cycles equivalent to 6.01 ± 0.50 mm/million cycles assuming a material density of 0.935 [ 29] and a cumulative wear after 5 million cycles of 28.68 ± 1.88 mg (30.67 ± 2.00 mm).