Sentence examples for average wall thickness from inspiring English sources

Multi walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) having 20 50 nm diameters and average wall thickness of 10 nm were synthesized with an yield of 6.03 g/30 g polyethylene.

Figure 1 shows the computerized 3D geometry of the used AAA with an average wall thickness of 2 mm.

Burst pressures of 485 ± 25 mm Hg were obtained from 4 mm internal diameter scaffolds with 453 ± 74 μm average wall thickness.

Their typical length is about 6 to 8 μm and the average wall thickness is 45, 60, and 150 nm for LSMO, LCMO, and LPCMO, respectively[54].

The average wall thickness of the nanotubes is measured to be 17.3 nm, and the thickness appears to be very uniform.

This overall average wall thickness could then be compared to the CAD file dimensions and other papers to give an idea of comparative manufacturing accuracy.

The model had fair transparency, allowing external inspection of model inserts such as stent grafts, and good flexibility with an overall discrepancy between CAD and physical model average wall thicknesses of 0.05 mm (2.5% thicker than the CAD model).

Six equidistant cross-section wall thicknesses were measured for each section, and the averaged wall thickness was calculated to be 2.05 mm, which is just 2.5% higher than the wall thickness in the CAD model (see details in Additional file 1: Table S13 in Appendix).

In total, 200 measurements based on four different reconstructions were performed to obtain statistically relevant results, yielding an average pore size of 2.10 ± 0.3 nm and average silica wall thickness of 2.40 ± 0.4 nm (the corresponding histograms are shown in Figure S4).

From the TEM image, the average pore wall thickness was calculated to be ~6 nm.

The IgG4-aortitis-positive vessel regions were thickened, with an average maximal wall thickness of 6.3 ± 2.9 mm.