Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(4)
The velocity values represented in Figure5 then depict the average velocity values at a maximum distance of 310 nm from the wall after correcting for exponential illumination intensity inherent in nPIV[28].
Corrected two-way travel times and average velocity values for 28 sorted common depth points were input into the transform for pore pressures prediction predicted pore pressures show a reasonable match when plotted against formation pressure data from the offset wells namely AD-4 trend, Agartala Dome-6.
The average velocity values with standard deviations are summarized in Table 1.
Low average velocity values (<0.2) led to the formation of small clusters of cells separated by empty strips.
Similar(56)
Near-wall images were captured and post-processed to evaluate the averaged velocity values in the measurement region next to the wall.
Mean velocity value is on average doubled in the cone swept by the paddle, and its two horizontal components are twice higher than its vertical ones.
The vertical lines indicate ± 1 standard deviation of the average phase velocity values.
Both seismic sections are oriented in the directions of west-east, and input data contain corrected values two-way travel time and average (normal) velocity values for various common depth points (CDP).
Both seismic sections are oriented in the direction of west-east and input data contain corrected values of two-way travel time and average (normal) velocity values for both sections.
When the videotapes were analyzed the analyzer settings were: frames at frame rate 20 – 25/sec, minimum contrast 8, minimum size 6, low/high size gates 0.6 – 1.5, low/high intensity gates 0.6 – 1.5, motile head size 16, non- motile intensity 371, medium VAP (average path velocity) value 30, low VAP value 10, slow cells not motile, and threshold straightness 60.
As shown in Fig. 3, the GPS map for the two approaches is very similar, so we employ the same average GPS velocity value and GPS error for both two papers, (v^{2}=23.16,{hbox {mm}}^2/{hbox {yr}}^2) and (sigma _{v}=0.1,{hbox {mm}}/{hbox {yr}}) (Lambert et al. 2013b).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com