The phrase "average tumor diameter" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in medical or scientific contexts when discussing the size of tumors in a statistical or comparative manner.
Example: "The study found that the average tumor diameter in patients was significantly reduced after treatment."
Alternatives: "mean tumor size" or "typical tumor diameter".
An increasing proportion of RCCs are discovered incidentally, and the average tumor diameter at diagnosis has decreased over the last few decades.
All tumors were dermis based in the upper eyelid, three-fourths invaded the orbicularis oculi muscle, and the average tumor diameter was 3.7 mm.
The average tumor diameter (two perpendicular axes of the tumor were measured) was measured in control and treated groups using a caliper.
Considering an average tumor diameter of 3 mm, the variation in light intensity on the tumor surface and the normal surrounding is expected to remain within the acceptable light intensity variance of ±5%.
Experiments started at an average tumor diameter of 6-8 mm.
The tumors were monitored, and treatment began when the average tumor diameter reached 5 7 mm, typically 5 7 days after the injection.
Average maximum tumor diameter was greater in interval cancers than in screen-detected cancers within each tertile of each mammographic measure and, as shown in Table 3, these differences were statistically significant in most of the comparisons shown.
In the transplanted cohort, the average total tumor diameter was similar between non-DM and DM patients (5.12 cm vs 5.81 cm, p=0.294), and similar proportions had a largest tumor that was >5cm in diameter (16.8% of non-DM vs 23.8% DM, p=0.274).
Since DFMO retarded tumor growth, DFMO-treated mice were euthanized when average local tumor diameters reached approximately 1.5 cm.
The changes in VCI with therapy are compared with histological and intravital optical microscopy (IVM) measurements of the average tumor blood vessel diameter and CBV.
This result is in good agreement with previous histology measures of the average tumor blood vessel diameter [20], which saw no differences between control (9.4±0.3 µm) and cediranib (9.5±0.4 µm) treated animals in the average vessel diameter of the tumor core after 2 days of treatment.
