Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "average systematic" is not commonly used in written English and may not convey a clear meaning without context.
It could potentially be used in contexts discussing statistical methods or research methodologies where "average" and "systematic" are relevant terms.
Example: "The study employed an average systematic approach to analyze the data collected over the year."
Alternatives: "typical systematic" or "standard systematic".
Exact(8)
For all orientations, the average systematic error of the two observers was calculated.
The average systematic error and the average ratios were evaluated as functions of the pelvic orientation.
For rotations and tilt up to 12°, the average systematic errors in the acetabular index varied from −8.8° to 4.5°.
In these figures, the average systematic errors as a function of pelvic rotation and pelvic tilt are given in a color matrix.
According to the specifications offered by their manufacturers, the average systematic error of the most frequently used eye-tracker systems is around 0.5° or less (e.g., SR Research, Inc., 2013b; Tobii Technology AB 2010).
The average systematic error in the AI measurements performed on the right acetabulum with pelvic rotations ranging from −12° to 12° and no tilt varied from −1.3° to 2.9°.
Similar(52)
Otherwise, the averaged measurement error would become equivalent to an averaged systematic error (assuming that the averaged random error is zero) and accuracy and trueness would be confounded.
Before we jump into the discussion, let's clarify the difference between dollar-cost averaging and systematic investing.
Spectrophotometric errors clearly affect the systematic (average) errors found in our performance characterization procedure.
Our null hypothesis is that the transformation on average has no systematic effect.
Therefore, for the vector plots in Fig. 6b, c, a systematic average (epsilon) and (rho) "background" have been subtracted.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com