Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(8)
The average specificity was 0.93 ± 0.07 for film versus 0.92 ± 0.08 for digitized images (P = 0.213).
Meanwhile, the average Specificity was slightly decreased, 0.56% in BT547.
On average, specificity was higher than 84%% (range of 56.3 % to 100%%), while sensitivity ranged from 8%to86.5%.5 %.
The maximum average specificity was 0.59 for α-value of 0.000001, while the average sensitivities for the other α-values were the same as 0.94.
Average specificity was higher in radiologists routinely interpreting mammograms with regard to radiologists who did not (66% vs 56%; p <.001).
Average sensitivity across all six years was 79%; average specificity was 81%; average PVP was 89% and average PVN was 67%.
Similar(52)
For all 3437 Pfam keywords the average specificity is 0.89 and the median is 0.93.
Thus, from the family perspective, the average specificity is 0.84 where the unannotated proteins are not counted.
Results show that, with the original cross-power matrix classified by SVM, high sensitivities of above 0.99 are achieved for all six patients and the average specificity is 0.91.
Average administration times ranged from less than 2 min to 6 min. Median sensitivity for major depression was 85% (range 50%to9797%); median specificity was 74% (range 51%to98%8%).
The average observed specificity was calculated and compared with the expected value (Fig. 2).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com