The phrase "average shape is" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the typical or most common form of an object or concept in a specific context, such as mathematics, art, or design.
Example: "In geometry, the average shape is often represented by a circle when considering the mean of various polygons."
Alternatives: "typical form is" or "mean shape is".
To test the model that microhabitat use of boulder edges reflects their larger gap sizes (relative to boulder centres), artificial boulders were constructed with the underside surface either flat, or with a gap underneath mimicking the mean size of the gap normally found only under boulder edges (when their average shape is considered among numerous naturally-occurring boulders).
If the average shape is not what is recognized, then a particular conformation must somehow be selected from the conformational ensemble.
Therefore, the pair of configurations used for each specimen and the resulting average shape are invariant under reflection and relabelling, and thus the average shape is symmetric [[ 35], p. 287].
The grand average shape was used as reference for the grid deformations, but the patterns of shape changes are the same if using an estimated root shape for the phyllostomid tree (using MorphoJ to map shape onto phylogeny [ 35]), as the difference between the grand average and the estimated root shape are negligible (results not shown).
Differences between female and male, older and younger (≤ 40/> 40) and left and right averaged shapes were determined.
Finally, the averaged shapes were filtered using the program DAMFILT (Volkov and Svergun, 2003).
Each seta was assigned to a region and the regional seta number and average interseta shape were computed.
The rate of divergence away from the average larval shape was compared among species using the slope of the regressions with Regress6 (IMP-software) ([for detailed explanations on this methodology, see [ 48, 56]).
The posterior distributions of the scaling law coefficients are used to define the predictive distributions of the GEV location and scale parameters for the out-of-sample sites given only their drainage areas and the posterior distribution of the average shape parameter is taken as the regional predictive distribution for this parameter.
An average size increase of 56% was observed for the vertical dimension of the pattern and average shape distortion was 13% (Figure 5(a - c)).
There were no differences, neither after IR nor between the sexes, and the average shape factor was below 0.5 in all groups.
